Assistance needed, please
Apr. 10th, 2011 01:38 pm26 months ago, the kitchen portion of our reno was "finished." I say "finished" because like with most major projects, some things get relegate to "later."
One of those many items we didn't get to was a back-splash for the kitchen. Like all good middle-class gay men who own their own homes, you know this is a MAJOR consideration. But have we made a decision yet? No.
Here's what the existing kitchen looks like (yes, this is post-remodel, design queens. Don't laugh).

Here's where YOU can help out. What's your opinion of these two backsplash selections?
Here are our caveats:
- We're design-conservative (read: scaredy-cats) and are thinking toward 'neutral' if (and when) we sell this house
- We spent lots of money on the remodel, but in my mind, I don't want to spend lots of money on a backsplash
- We're both procrastinators about this (and a few other projects) which is making us cranky.
- We know we'll have to make a decision about the grout color, too!
- We're doing the complete run under the cabinets, but not wrapping around the corners.
- There is under-cabinet lighting all the way, including over the stove (turned off in photo)
- We only need about 18 square feet of tile (16 feet for the run and 2 feet for fill-in)
Tile 1 - tumbled stone and glass, (1/2 inch thick) $13.99 a sheet (1 square foot).


Tile 2 - mini squares of glass, copper/brown shades, very thin (1/4 inch thick), $4.99 a sheet (1 square foot)


Other options:
- No backsplash. Keep the brick red color
- Small backsplash. Just over the stove (which tile, then?)
- All the options aren't my cup of tea. Go with something bolder.
What say ye people of good taste and breeding?
One of those many items we didn't get to was a back-splash for the kitchen. Like all good middle-class gay men who own their own homes, you know this is a MAJOR consideration. But have we made a decision yet? No.
Here's what the existing kitchen looks like (yes, this is post-remodel, design queens. Don't laugh).
Here's where YOU can help out. What's your opinion of these two backsplash selections?
Here are our caveats:
- We're design-conservative (read: scaredy-cats) and are thinking toward 'neutral' if (and when) we sell this house
- We spent lots of money on the remodel, but in my mind, I don't want to spend lots of money on a backsplash
- We're both procrastinators about this (and a few other projects) which is making us cranky.
- We know we'll have to make a decision about the grout color, too!
- We're doing the complete run under the cabinets, but not wrapping around the corners.
- There is under-cabinet lighting all the way, including over the stove (turned off in photo)
- We only need about 18 square feet of tile (16 feet for the run and 2 feet for fill-in)
Tile 1 - tumbled stone and glass, (1/2 inch thick) $13.99 a sheet (1 square foot).
Tile 2 - mini squares of glass, copper/brown shades, very thin (1/4 inch thick), $4.99 a sheet (1 square foot)
Other options:
- No backsplash. Keep the brick red color
- Small backsplash. Just over the stove (which tile, then?)
- All the options aren't my cup of tea. Go with something bolder.
What say ye people of good taste and breeding?
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:35 pm (UTC)For me, I'd turn the corners and do the backsplash along anywhere you've got the granite counter to unify it. If that's not what you want, then do only over the stove (maybe a few inches on either side as well, as that helps with any splatter from the stove).
I find #2 to be too busy (both in color and in lots of little tiles), especially with how busy the countertop looks. I'd go with #1 which adds sweeping lines to the kitchen.
If you're only doing over the stove, then maybe #2 works, because it's more like an extension of the countertop over just that one area.
I'm thinking that if you want to save money now, just leave it as it is. Plan on either re-painting or installing a backsplash when you go to sell -- that has the benefit of modernizing the kitchen to appeal to buyers, although you won't get any of that benefit.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:43 pm (UTC)Unlike some 'model' kitchens, both of us cook frequently and use blenders and mixers frequently, so we do have some mess above the counter. (I've noticed how greasy the microwave vents have gotten recently).
My problem is how to think outside the box.
And the reality is that it's only the guy that designed the kitchen (dimensions/cabinetry) is the only one that keeps asking when we'll put in a backsplash. No one else would care, really.
So, your last paragraph is what it's all about.
The total cost of this minor part of the remodel is no more than $300.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 10:52 pm (UTC)If you find that the walls rarely need cleaning, then go without any backsplash.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 12:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 02:21 am (UTC)Yes, larger tiles might be a good idea.
no subject
Date: 2011-04-10 11:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 02:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 05:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 12:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 03:42 pm (UTC)i prefer the larger tile option (#1) if you forced me to choose. years ago i put in a stainless steel back splash with a herringbone "pattern" etched in...was easy to clean. but i think with the way your kitchen is situated, that wouldn't be a good look because it breaks the sightline in the wall. (ok....perhaps that was more like 3¢ worth...)
no subject
Date: 2011-04-11 05:18 pm (UTC)And I promise to not critique your backsplash in the event we're ever invited to a do at your casita!
no subject
Date: 2011-04-13 05:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-18 04:31 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-04-18 10:19 am (UTC)